When conducting research, especially involving human subjects, it is crucial to follow the federal regulations. These regulations are formulated to guarantee the safety and privacy of the subjects involved. One of the elements of these guidelines is the Institutional Review Board (IRB), which plays a critical role in overseeing the conduct of the study. One important aspect of the IRB’s job is the expedited review process, but when is this process used?
Expedited review is when the IRB reviews a proposed study faster than the usual timeframe. It’s not a shortcut or a way to bypass any necessary steps of a full board review. Instead, it’s a streamlined process designed to ensure that certain types of studies can proceed without undue delay. It’s important to note that an expedited review doesn’t mean less scrutiny; it simply refers to the speed of the process.
According to federal regulations, expedited review can be used when the research involves minimal risk to the subjects. Minimal risk is the chances and magnitude of harm or discomfort anticipated in the research are not greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life or during routine physical or psychological examinations or tests. This could include studies such as blood draws, surveys, interviews, or observations of public behavior when confidentiality is maintained.
The decision to use expedited review is based on specific criteria outlined in the federal regulations. The research must not be classified as more than ‘minimal risk,’ and the procedures must be listed in the categories identified as eligible for expedited review by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). These categories include clinical studies of drugs and medical devices, collection of data through noninvasive procedures, and research involving materials that have been collected or will be collected solely for research purposes, among others.
The expedited review process is vital as it ensures that research involving minimal risk to subjects can proceed swiftly while still maintaining ethical standards and protecting subjects’ rights. It allows researchers to conduct their studies promptly, which can be particularly important in fast-moving fields or responses to public health emergencies.
In conclusion, the expedited review process is an integral part of the federal regulations guiding research involving human subjects. It provides a fast-track review for studies posing minimal risk without compromising the safety and privacy of the subjects involved. Therefore, understanding when and how it can be used is crucial for researchers and IRBs. Remember, expediting does not mean the importance of the review is diminished; it simply means the review is done more swiftly.
Related Posts: Difference Between Data Science And Data Analytics