Paul Pelosi’s questionable Wall Street windfall spurs bipartisan calls for stock trading ban

This post was originally published on this site

An overwhelming majority of Americans believe Congress is inept, broken and hopelessly addicted to maintaining power while acting far too much like drunken sophomores on Twitter. And most people believe Capitol Hill can’t get the most basic things done even when there’s bipartisan agreement. Hence its 16 percent approval rating.

For those who live in a sane world wallpapered in logic, this proposal makes perfect sense. Why? Because currently lawmakers can pass legislation that creates favorable conditions for certain companies or industries, and if a lawmaker knows that this legislation will pass, he or she could profit off it.

Banning stocks from being traded on Capitol Hill is something that brings together even the likes of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-N.Y.) and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who couldn’t agree on what time it is even while staring at the same clock.

“We have to be able to assure the American people that they don’t have to worry about if they’re competing with their member of Congress’s stock portfolio in order to be heard,” Ocasio-Cortez said recently. “It’s a pretty simple concept.”

Now more eyes are turning to Paul Pelosi, the House speaker’s husband. From a trading perspective, he’s like the real-life version of Gordon Gekko from the 1987 Oliver Stone classic “Wall Street.” His portfolio has substantially outperformed the S&P 500. In 2020 alone, a year when the stock market was as turbulent as in any year in recent memory thanks to COVID-19 shutdowns, Paul outperformed the S&P 500 by 14.3 percent, according to Hawley’s office. And per a New York Post analysis, the Pelosis have made approximately $30 million from trades involving Big Tech companies the House speaker is responsible for regulating. 

In fact, Paul is so good that there’s an app that allows the public to follow his stock trades. And for good reason: The Pelosi’s reported net worth is more than $114 million, according to Per a Business Insider report, “a vast majority of the couple’s wealth is derived from stocks, options, and investments made by Paul Pelosi.”

In March 2021, Paul Pelosi exercised options to purchase 25,000 Microsoft shares worth more than $5 million. Less than two weeks later, the U.S. Army disclosed a $21.9 billion deal to buy augmented reality headsets from Microsoft. Shares of the company rose sharply after the deal was announced.

For his latest purchase in June, Paul Pelosi bought up to $5 million in stock options (equal to 20,000 shares) of Nvidia, a leading semiconductor company. The purchase, first reported by The Daily Caller, comes as Congress is set to vote on legislation later this month that would result in $52 billion in subsidies allocated to elevate the chip-production industry as it faces increased competition from China. 

So how does the House speaker explain such a huge buy by her husband so perfectly timed ahead of this vote? 

“These transactions are marked ‘SP’ for Spouse. The Speaker has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” her spokesperson explained recently

But if Paul Pelosi makes money in the stock market, wouldn’t his spouse also benefit? The explanation inspires little confidence, but at least these trades are inspiring the House and Senate to act to try to prevent it from happening again. A vote is expected as early as Tuesday on the bipartisan $52 billion bill to boost U.S. semiconductor manufacturing while providing tax credits for production. 

Meanwhile, Paul Pelosi continues to have the magic touch. On June 17, he exercised 200 call options on Nvidia. The stock closed at $158.80 that day. On Friday, July 22, it closed at 173.19.

In the end, members of Congress have access to a lot of sensitive information that can help make them seriously richer. 

“The most valuable commodity I know is information,” Gordon Gekko, played by Michael Douglas, once declared. 

Information on laws coming down the pike is what members of Congress certainly have. The questions around whether Paul and Nancy Pelosi are profiting are only going to get louder if Congress fails to act. 

Joe Concha is a media and politics columnist.